Complete the form below to ask us a question or make an enquiry. We’ll get back to you via phone or email as soon as possible.

Insights

Cost Budgets and Precedent H – Essential Guidance

Posted on 31st October 2018 in Dispute Resolution

Posted by

Dan Griffin

Associate and Solicitor
Cost Budgets and Precedent H – Essential Guidance

The normal rule in litigation is that the successful party is entitled to recover its costs from the other party. The Civil Procedure rules now give courts wide discretion in controlling the amount of costs parties can recover. The rules require parties to submit a budget (i.e. breakdown) of the legal costs they expect to incur. Precedent H is the prescribed form for that budget which must be filed in the majority cases which are valued at over £25,000.

There is a strict deadline for filing precedent H which must be met or the consequences can be dire, with the chance to recover legal costs from the other side dramatically reduced.

The purpose of cost budgeting is to control recoverable costs. It does not govern a client’s own liability for their own solicitors’ costs, disbursements such as experts and travel fees or barristers fees. There will always be a proportion that are unlikely to be recovered meaning there is an inevitable shortfall, the general rule is that a successful party can expect to recover between 60-90% of their own costs. Parties to litigation must always be aware if they win and make excellent recovery it will not amount to the other side paying all their costs.

Precedent H is a standard format and a clunky tool which sets out predefined stages with provision for contingencies. Often work does not fit neatly into one stage or another and there are numerous problems where the form simply fails to provide the opportunity to record important costs which have already been incurred. This can take some careful drafting and knowledge of the court’s approach.

A precedent H that accurately predicts what costs are likely to be incurred in a way that a judge will be able to follow can convince the court that the costs are justified. This is essential to ensuring that the maximum amount is recoverable.

If you require any advice regarding a matter similar to this then please do not hesitate to get in touch with our experienced team of dispute resolution solicitors on 01392 207020.

Company & Industry

Related Insights

Insights

Protection from Domestic Abuse

Posted on 21st February 2020 in Family Law

According to the Office of National Statistics in the year ending March 2019, 1.6 million women and 786,000 men experienced domestic abuse. The number of women and girls killed in England and Wales had also risen to its highest level in 14 years with a 10% increase having been documented. Between March 2018 and March 2019 there were 241 recorded female victims of murder, manslaughter and infanticide with 48% of those victims being killed in a domestic homicide, and 38% of those victims being killed at the hands of their partner or ex-partner.

Posted by

Sarah Miller

Associate Member of CILEx
Insights

Essential guidance for negotiating software as a service (SaaS) contracts

Posted on 21st February 2020 in Intellectual Property

With the increase in cloud computing, SaaS has become a widely adopted model for procuring software that would otherwise require investment in hardware, hosting and development. There are a number of important considerations for the customer buying access to the software when entering into a SaaS agreement.

Posted by

Dan Griffin

Associate and Solicitor