In response to the increasing challenge of Coronavirus and in light of rapidly evolving advice, Tozers has taken steps to ensure that we continue to provide you with our usual client service whilst also maintaining the safety of our clients and colleagues. Please see our full update here.

Complete the form below to ask us a question or make an enquiry. We’ll get back to you via phone or email as soon as possible.

Insights

Definition of “residential curtilage” clarified by High Court

Posted on 11th July 2017 in Planning and Licensing

Posted by

Amy Cater

Partner and Solicitor
Definition of “residential curtilage” clarified by High Court

The case involved a landowner who had been served with an enforcement notice for erecting a building on land which he claimed to be residential curtilage. 

The landowner sought to rely on permitted development rights (Class E of Schedule 2 of the General Permitted Development Order 2015) for the building and argued that the land was within the curtilage of the main house as evidenced by the fact that the Local Planning Authority had previously granted a certificate of lawfulness for the use of that land as a garden incidental to the enjoyment of the main dwellinghouse.   The Planning Inspector upheld the enforcement notice and the landowner appealed.  The High Court dismissed the appeal, accepting the Inspector’s decision that the land was not curtilage.

The word curtilage is not defined in statute.  However, there are some important cases which discuss curtilage, and the Judge in one of the leading cases (Dyer) described it as “an area of land attached to a house and forming one enclosure with it”.   The High Court in this case confirmed that whether or not land is within the curtilage of a dwellinghouse will be a question of fact and degree each time for the decision maker (Local Planning Authority or Planning Inspector).  When determining what constitutes curtilage the decision maker has to identify (i) the physical layout (ii) ownership, past and present and (iii) use or function, past and present.    Whilst the function of the land is relevant to the question of curtilage, it is not determinative.  The fact that the land in question had been used for domestic purposes for more than 10 years did not mean that it was residential curtilage.

This case confirms the principle that curtilage is not a land use but rather it is a description of land attached to a building.

 

See: Burford v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Test Valley Borough Council [2017] EWHC 1493 (Admin)

Contact our Planning Law Experts

Company & Industry

Related Insights

Insights

Digital Lasting Powers of Attorney

Posted on 03rd August 2020 in Later Life Planning

The Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) has launched a digital ‘Use a Lasting Power of Attorney’ tool to help make attorneyship administration simpler and safer for those involved.

Posted by

Sue Halfyard

Associate and Chartered Legal Executive
Insights

Possession claims during Covid

Posted on 30th July 2020 in Affordable Housing

With the stay in possession proceedings ending on 24 August 2020 there is renewed uncertainty for the future.

Posted by

Jenny Lloyd

Associate and Solicitor