The effects of coronavirus on your legal rights and our service.

Complete the form below to ask us a question or make an enquiry. We’ll get back to you via phone or email as soon as possible.

Insights

Definition of “residential curtilage” clarified by High Court

Posted on 11th July 2017 in Planning and Licensing

Posted by

Amy Cater

Partner and Solicitor
Definition of “residential curtilage” clarified by High Court

A recent case involved a landowner who had been served with an enforcement notice for erecting a building on land which he claimed to be residential curtilage.

The landowner sought to rely on permitted development rights (Class E of Schedule 2 of the General Permitted Development Order 2015) for the building and argued that the land was within the curtilage of the main house as evidenced by the fact that the Local Planning Authority had previously granted a certificate of lawfulness for the use of that land as a garden incidental to the enjoyment of the main dwellinghouse. The Planning Inspector upheld the enforcement notice and the landowner appealed. The High Court dismissed the appeal, accepting the Inspector’s decision that the land was not curtilage.

statue

The word curtilage is not defined in statute. However, there are some important cases which discuss curtilage, and the Judge in one of the leading cases (Dyer) described it as “an area of land attached to a house and forming one enclosure with it”. The High Court in this case confirmed that whether or not land is within the curtilage of a dwellinghouse will be a question of fact and degree each time for the decision maker (Local Planning Authority or Planning Inspector). When determining what constitutes curtilage the decision maker has to identify (i) the physical layout (ii) ownership, past and present and (iii) use or function, past and present. Whilst the function of the land is relevant to the question of curtilage, it is not determinative. The fact that the land in question had been used for domestic purposes for more than 10 years did not mean that it was residential curtilage.

This case confirms the principle that curtilage is not a land use but rather it is a description of land attached to a building.

 

For any help with planning applications or enforcements please contact our dedicated Planning Law team, or visit their hub page.

Contact our team

 

See: Burford v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Test Valley Borough Council [2017] EWHC 1493 (Admin)

Company & Industry

Related Insights

Insights

Does the construction of a bike training circuit for personal use in your garden require planning permission?

Posted on 26th November 2021 in Planning and Licensing

The case involved a bike training circuit that had been set up in someone’s garden. It included the creation of tracks, jumps, ramps and scaffolding towers. The local authority took enforcement action alleging a material change of use of the garden to a mixed use for residential use and mountain bike purposes and use for motorised sport. The landowner appealed against the enforcement notice.

Posted by

Alex McKerron

Chartered Legal Executive
Insights

Is a glamping pod or shepherd’s hut a building?

Posted on 15th October 2021 in Planning and Licensing

In a recent decision issued by the Valuation Office Agency (VOA) it was confirmed that a shepherd's hut and a glamping pod met the definition of ‘caravan’.

Posted by

Amy Cater

Partner and Solicitor