COVID-19 Update: Tozers is providing our usual client services while maintaining the safety of our clients and colleagues. Full update here

Complete the form below to ask us a question or make an enquiry. We’ll get back to you via phone or email as soon as possible.

Insights

How Business Property Relief (BPR) affects holiday parks and lets

Posted on 09th November 2020 in Parks

Posted by

Rachael Morley

Associate and Solicitor
How Business Property Relief (BPR) affects holiday parks and lets

A Revenue victory against the taxpayer has put another nail in the coffin for businesses hoping to obtain Business Property Relief from Inheritance Tax.

In (Cox (Executors) v HMRC 2020 UKFTT 442 TC), the business in question was a furnished holiday let. Although the Revenue has always had a suspicious eye on businesses of this nature for BPR (Business Property Relief) purposes, the Executors here felt that they had a good case. After all, the services were enough to push the business into being a ‘trading’ one - surely?

For Business Property Relief purposes, Inheritance Tax relief will only apply if the enterprise is not deemed to consist “wholly or mainly of...making or holding investments”. Strange as it seems, the Revenue makes a very fine distinction between businesses using land:

  • On the one hand, a business managing a portfolio of tenanted properties would fall short of the test. Here, the Revenue argues that the business is holding the properties as a means of generating rental income and so class it as being carried out for investment purposes, so BPR is denied.
  • By contrast, if the same portfolio of properties were used to provide bed and breakfast accommodation, the Revenue would usually class the business as a trading business and so permit Inheritance Tax relief. The justification for this is the additional level of service offered to the users of the bed and breakfast business; in the Revenue’s eyes, the fees are for more than simply staying the night.

Here, the furnished holiday let business offered a library of books for its guests to use, puzzles, games, use of fishing nets, tennis racquets and balls, and even the occasional baby or dog-sitting service, as well as offering a taxi service where needed.

In the judge’s eyes, though, the childcare and taxi ‘services’ were too rarely offered to be of significance and the other elements were of small weight in the context of the business. The decision, then, was to deny BPR.

This case is a salutary reminder that, for businesses such as furnished holiday lets and parks, the question of whether BPR can apply really is on the borderline. Quality and quantity of services are all-important and it is vital to seek advice in presenting your case to the Revenue.

 

To find out more or gain any advice or support from both our dedicated Parks team and Wealth Management team, please visit their hub pages or contact our expert lawyers directly.

Contact our expert lawyers

 


 

Paper plane

 

Get the latest news straight from our legal experts.

Subscribe to our newsletter to recieve current, dedicated, suppport and guidance from our solicitors straight to your inbox, wherever you are.

Company & Industry

Related Insights

Insights

Can a lasting power of attorney be witnessed remotely?

Posted on 23rd November 2020 in Later Life Planning

During Lockdown we have seen various changes in the law regarding how Wills can be finalised during the pandemic, including the use of remote witnesses. However, what has been less well publicised are whether there are any equivalent rules for the remote signing of Lasting Powers of Attorneys (LPAs).

Posted by

Naomi Hoare

Solicitor
Insights

Arrangements over the festive period

Posted on 11th November 2020 in Family Law

Every year, we receive an influx of enquiries from parents facing difficulties with arrangements over the festive period. This year, sorting out these arrangements as early as possible is likely to be more important than ever.

Posted by

Aimee Aspinall

Chartered Legal Executive