COVID-19 Update: Tozers is providing our usual client services while maintaining the safety of our clients and colleagues. Full update here

Complete the form below to ask us a question or make an enquiry. We’ll get back to you via phone or email as soon as possible.

Insights

Purchase reservation agreements

Posted on 02nd February 2019 in Residential Property

Posted by

Nick Conner

Partner and Solicitor
Purchase reservation agreements

Aside from being gazumped, one of the worst fears of a party to a property transaction is the other side getting cold feet and pulling out at the last moment without a good reason.

One way to mitigate against this is for the parties to enter into a form of agreement (commonly referred to as an ‘exclusivity agreement’ or ‘reservation agreement’) whereby the seller is locked into selling only to the stated buyer for a defined period of time. In consideration of the seller tying his or her hands in that way, the buyer agrees to pay a non-refundable sum of money upon signing the agreement, which the seller is entitled to keep if the buyer fails to exchange contracts within the stated period.

In over ten years of working in residential property, I have completed less than a handful of such agreements in a residential context, so they are rare. The primary reason for this is that a buyer will want certain caveats in the agreement preventing the reservation fee from being released to the seller if the buyer does not exchange for good reason, such as a title defect being uncovered once the property papers are reviewed. Even defining the term ‘title defect’ in a way that will satisfy both parties is difficult and so my view when speaking with clients is to try and have them focus efforts and resources on getting to exchange of the main contract itself; rather than wasting effort and expense arguing over a form of initial agreement.

Ambitiously, the Government is preparing a form of reservation agreement, which it hopes will catch on in the property industry. Housing Minister, Heather Wheeler, comments:

“We want to increase people’s commitment by ensuring they get some skin in the game…there is no reason why this cannot become a standard practice. I believe the appetite is there. The government will ‘run a field trial later this year’.”

No-one can dispute the sentiment but finding a form of agreement that will satisfy both sellers and buyers and fit transactions of all values is a tough ask.

Behavioural insight

Part of the process will be to commission ‘behavioural insight’ research to identify the parameters of the agreement so the agreement is fair to both sellers and buyers, and that buyers don’t get trapped into buying a property they don’t want if there are justifiable reasons to withdraw from a purchase. However, if a buyer does want to ‘get out of jail free’ by citing something trivial as a reason to pull out, then that option will be taken away, with the suggestion being that a buyer will have to ‘buy their way out’ if they pull out without reasonable cause. However, how much that will be and how one would in practice enforce the agreement, is still being ironed out.

What is ‘reasonable cause’?

Unless the reservation agreement includes clear definitions, it could be difficult to enforce the penalty fees within it. In particular, what will be reasonable in a particular set of circumstances? If it is something trivial such as the seller changing the colour of the bathroom since first viewing, a penalty fee would surely be fair. However, if a buyer pulls out because of the discovery of subsidence that wasn’t previously known about, should they still be made to pay an exit fee from the agreement? One would think not, but there will be grey areas in-between such as the discovery of inadequate rights of way and whether it would be reasonable for a buyer to accept indemnity insurance or not.

Another problematic area is defining exactly at what point a sale has been agreed. Is it when a seller has accepted a buyer’s offer, or at the point when contracts are exchanged? This single point could have a big bearing on how effective reservation fees are. The closer to the final exchange of contracts that point is put, the more financial impact a sudden buyer withdrawal could have. This, in turn, could have a marked effect on the penalty fees incurred.

The plus side of such an additional agreement is that it would stop buyers who are not fully committed to a sale from pulling out without a very good reason, as the financial costs could be considerable.

Getting the legal experts on your side

Buying and selling a house is the single largest financial transaction most of us will ever make. It is already tangled up with yards of red tape. If you’re planning to buy or sell a property and want to make sure you’re not going to end up paying more than you should, contact us to talk to a property conveyancing expert for advice on the most recent developments in property legislation.

Company & Industry

Related Insights

Insights

Do pensions count as assets when dealing with a divorce?

Posted on 22nd October 2020 in Family Law

Whether retirement is imminent or even some way off, pensions are still taken into consideration when dealing with assets on divorce, and can actually often be the largest asset to consider. Irrespective of who the pension belongs to, it is still an asset about which a court can make orders on divorce. This applies both ways, meaning each spouse will have a ‘claim’ against the other’s pension provision.

Posted by

Aimee Aspinall

Chartered Legal Executive
Insights

Unclaimed estates totalling £1.744bn from those without Wills

Posted on 02nd October 2020 in Probate & Wills

It has been reported by a north-east property developer that there are approximately 7,991 estates currently left unclaimed in England and Wales. The total value of which is estimated at £1.744bn, equating to £218,300 per estate. They report that the majority of these estates have been left by single people who have not made a Will.

Posted by

Sue Halfyard

Associate and Chartered Legal Executive