COVID-19 Update: Tozers is providing our usual client services while maintaining the safety of our clients and colleagues. Full update here

Complete the form below to ask us a question or make an enquiry. We’ll get back to you via phone or email as soon as possible.

Insights

The Inheritance Act and Adult Children

Posted on 23rd February 2021 in Dispute Resolution

Posted by

Martin Laver

Partner and Solicitor
The Inheritance Act and Adult Children

Following our recent insight on the Inheritance Act and Minor Children, this insight moves onto another category of claimant under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (“Inheritance Act”) - adult children.

The Supreme Court judgement in Ilot v Mitson provided rare and useful guidance for all legal practitioners on adult claimants in Inheritance Act claims.

  1. The wishes of the testator should be respected as far as possible.
  2. All factors within section 3 of the Inheritance Act should be considered.
  3. The closeness of the relationship is relevant, in particular, any estrangement and length of it.
  4. An award for reasonable financial provision is not to provide a wealthy lifestyle, but to meet the everyday expenses of living.
  5. When considering the amount for an award, housing can be dealt with by way of a life interest (i.e. an income) rather than a significant lump sum to purchase property.
  6. Charities do not need to justify a claim for the inheritance when they are the testator’s chosen beneficiaries.
  7. Every case will turn on its own facts and will be decided on a case by case basis.

 

It is probably no surprise to anyone that the basic position is that the testator has freedom to leave their estate to whomever they like, and that should be respected as far as possible.

This principle coupled with the case of Ilot v Mitson has created much uncertainty and risk for adult claimants and estates alike.

The more recent case of Wellesley v Wellesley demonstrates the difficulties which now face adult claimants under Inheritance Act. This case concerned an estate worth around £1.3m. The deceased left a legacy of £20,000 to his estranged daughter. The estranged daughter brought a claim under the Inheritance Act and sought a substantial part of the estate to allow her to train and work as an artist.

The applicant had been estranged from the deceased for over 30 years as he did not approve of the applicant’s lifestyle which included alcohol and drugs. The applicant lived on state benefits and lived in secure council housing. The claim failed and no award in addition to the £20,000 legacy was made to the applicant, with the  Court’s decision being made due to the following factors:

  1. The long estrangement caused by the applicant’s lifestyle and so there was no ‘moral obligation’ to provide maintenance for the applicant, nor was there a reasonable expectation of financial provision.
  2. The deceased’s testamentary freedom and the guidance provided in Ilot (summary above).
  3. The factors provided for in section 3 of Inheritance Act were considered and it was concluded that the applicant was able to live within her means and so there was no particular financial need for housing or resources (even though the application was in receipt of state funded support).

 

From this case we can observe the following advice:

  1. Wellesley demonstrates difficulty for adult claimants in a post Ilot
  2. The Court will try their best to uphold freedom of testamentary disposition and will not move away from this position without just cause.
  3. A claimant must demonstrate a clear requirement for financial assistance for housing and/or resources. Wellesley demonstrates that the Court will not necessarily replace state funded support with private wealth (this has been a particular cause of debate over the years).
  4. It is unknown what impact the legacy of £20,000 had on Wellesley. In the event there was no legacy to the claimant, and the result of this case may have been slightly different with a small award granted.

 

Although there is an uphill battle for adult claimants, there are a number of factors to be taken into account and each circumstance is different. It is possible for adult claimants to succeed in one way or another.

 

For further advice and guidance on claiming under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 please contact our team of expert lawyers.

Contact the team


 

Paper plane

 

Get the latest news straight from our legal experts.

Subscribe to our newsletter to recieve current, dedicated, suppport and guidance from our solicitors straight to your inbox, wherever you are.

 

Company & Industry

Related Insights

Insights

Call for hospitals to use gold-standard GBS test

Posted on 25th February 2021 in Medical Negligence

Patient Safety Minister Nadine Dorries has issued a call for hospitals to use gold-standard test for mothers at risk of giving babies Group B Strep, after the large-scale National Institute for Health Research-funded clinical trial on testing for GBS had received ethical approval in 2019 with an estimated 80 hopsitals required to take part ensuring the rial screening could reach 320,00 women, only 15 hospitals have been able to commit.

Posted by

Stuart Bramley

Partner and Solicitor
Insights

Rise in post-pandemic probate claims

Posted on 19th February 2021 in Probate & Wills

A recent article has reported that there has been a marked rise in claims being brought against estates. These claims are mainly being made under the provisions of the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 whereby claimants argue that they have not received reasonable financial provision from an estate. 

Posted by

Sue Halfyard

Associate and Chartered Legal Executive