Complete the form below to ask us a question or make an enquiry. We’ll get back to you via phone or email as soon as possible.

Insights

No-fault compensation for Clinical Negligence

Posted on 03rd February 2021 in Medical Negligence

Posted by

Endurance Arthur

Partner and Solicitor
No-fault compensation for Clinical Negligence

An article in the Law Society Gazette from 2 February 2021 looked at the possibility of a total overhaul of the system of clinical negligence compensation within the NHS by ministers. Health minister Nadine Dorries told the health and social care committee that a review of the system was going ‘at pace’ and could involve all claims against the NHS.

The evidence session discussed ongoing safety concerns with maternity services in England following incidents at East Kent Hospitals University Trust and Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, which our Medical Negligence team commented on.

 

Our co-Head of our Medical Negligence team, Partner and Solicitor, Stuart Bramley commented on the article, saying, “The current system of dealing with compensation for medical errors may have faults, but 'no-fault compensation' (NCS) is not the answer. This is an issue which is repeatedly raised whenever the cost of clinical negligence arises, with the last being less than 5 years ago. “No Fault Compensation Schemes – A Rapid, Realist Review” was published by the DoH. Although it led to no changes at all, it noted that schemes already in place in France and Sweden are, contrary to what many think, very much based on fault. A scheme in New Zealand omits the idea of blame but is only available to those in work, excluding many babies, children and the elderly who are left often very badly injured through the errors of others.

Although Nadine Dorries’ comments suggest that she is more concerned about fairness than saving money, many who support NCS suggest that it would reduce the costs to the Health Service. However, under the current system compensation is only paid to those who decide to take action; go through what can often be a lengthy and stressful process; and then succeed in establishing negligence. If instead every patient who had an adverse outcome received damages, the overall cost would rocket. The only way of avoiding that would be if the level of damages to each injured person reduced significantly, and compensation is very carefully calculated by both sides to ensure that the needs triggered by the mistake are properly addressed for life. NCS would not be a solution but rather an unfair and expensive system which the hard-pressed Health Service really does not need”.

 

If you or your family have suffered because of medical negligence, we’ll help you to rebuild your life for the future. Contact us today and let us help you.

Contact our legal experts


 

Paper plane

 

Get the latest news straight from our legal experts.

Subscribe to our newsletter to recieve current, dedicated, suppport and guidance from our solicitors straight to your inbox, wherever you are.

Company & Industry

Related Insights

Insights

Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy – A Parent’s Experience

Posted on 04th April 2024 in Medical Negligence

For many years we at Tozers have supported families affected by Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE). HIE is a type of brain damage which is caused by a lack of oxygen to the brain before or shortly after birth. We assist families to bring a claim for compensation where their child has developed physical and/or cognitive difficulties. 

Posted by

Clair Hemming

Partner and Solicitor
Insights

The Implementation of Martha’s Rule

Posted on 22nd February 2024 in Medical Negligence

On World Sepsis Day 2023, I wrote an article raising awareness of this devastating illness, and shared the work being courageously undertaken by Martha’s parents, after Martha sadly and avoidably lost her life to sepsis at just 13 years old.

Posted by

Helena Campbell

Associate & Chartered Legal Executive