Complete the form below to ask us a question or make an enquiry. We’ll get back to you via phone or email as soon as possible.

Insights

What is copyright infringement?

Posted on 25th March 2021 in Intellectual Property

Posted by

Jill Headford

Partner and Solicitor
What is copyright infringement?

A law firm has paid £45,000 in damages after admitting to sending letters of claim written by another firm. While imitation may be the sincerest form of flattery, it can certainly also be the most expensive.

The case has raised eyebrows amongst lawyers used to ‘taking inspiration’ from other lawyers’ work.  After all, the efficient practice of law is made possible by using precedent documents adapted over and over to suit successive clients’ instructions. This avoidance of “re-inventing the wheel” every time is generally a good thing because work can be done more quickly and safely when the documents have been scrutinised many times before for potential pitfalls. Banks of precedent documents are either developed by the firm itself over time or acquired from specialist third-party providers. 

Unfortunately for the defendant firm, they were provided with the offending letter by a barrister who could not claim ownership of the copyright because he had in turn acquired it from the claimant firm (concerning an earlier, unrelated case) and so it belonged to them. The infringement only came to light when, while defending a dispute on behalf of a client, the claimant firm received one of their own letters. Aside from the inevitable feeling of schadenfreude, the case invites consideration of what degree of copying amounts to infringement in this context.

What is copyright infringement?

Copyright infringement is the use or production of copyrighted material without the permission of the copyright holder.

What degree of copying amounts to infringement?

Copyright subsists in original ‘literary works’ which includes standard legal letters. The Copyright lies in the presentation of the work (i.e. how the work is presented on the page) not in the ideas it expresses, so a firm of solicitors cannot claim ownership of any particular legal principle or argument.  That is why the doctrine of legal precedent does not offend copyright.

Infringement only arises where the whole or a substantial part of the original work is copied. What amounts to substantial is a qualitative rather than quantitative test, meaning the importance of the part copied to the original is what matters, not the amount that is copied. Given the content of letters of claim is largely proscribed by court rules and that brevity is encouraged in solicitors’ correspondence, this makes it quite difficult to avoid allegations of copying.

Thankfully most firms are too sensible to be other than gratified when an opponent has seen fit to adopt their drafting and lawyers usually apply considerable thought to the appropriateness of what they are adopting.  But the offending letter probably went too far and consisted of largely copying and pasting the original.

While this might seem an esoteric argument between lawyers, it has important lessons for anyone “borrowing” someone else’s legal documents. For example, while it can be tempting to copy and paste a competitor’s online terms of business or privacy policy this could very well result in copyright infringement (quite apart from being highly unsafe in terms of the appropriateness of the terms and the quality of the drafting).

The barrister concerned has since admitted a ‘technical’ infringement of copyright.

Find out more

If you would like any help or support then visit our dedicated Intellectual Property pages or contact our expert team.

Contact our legal experts

Company & Industry

Related Insights

Insights

Disputes Settled, Not Fought: 4 Ways We Avoided Court for Our Clients

Posted on 02nd June 2025 in Intellectual Property, Dispute Resolution

When people hear the word ‘litigation’ they often picture a courtroom showdown. In reality, however, disputes rarely make it that far. The modern litigation process is designed to promote early settlement (even after proceedings are issued) and very few cases are actually decided in a Court or Tribunal.

Posted by

Jessica Whittick

Solicitor
Insights

Your Song, Their Training Data: Who Owns AI’s Inspiration?

Posted on 27th May 2025 in Intellectual Property

When Sir Elton John accuses the government of “committing theft,” it’s not just a headline: it’s a warning. The copyright debate around artificial intelligence has hit a crescendo following the proposed protections in the Data (Use and Access) Bill.

Posted by

Jessica Whittick

Solicitor