Complete the form below to ask us a question or make an enquiry. We’ll get back to you via phone or email as soon as possible.

Insights

American Express fined by the ICO for marketing emails sent without valid consent

Posted on 21st May 2021 in Intellectual Property

Posted by

Jill Headford

Partner and Solicitor
American Express fined by the ICO for marketing emails sent without valid consent

The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has fined American Express £90,000 for sending over 4 million unsolicited marketing emails between 1 June 2018 and 21 May 2019 to existing customers without consent.

Many of these emails were messages purportedly providing customers with information about their account but they also promoted American Express products, encouraged customers to spend on their credit cards and download a mobile app. American Express had rejected customer complaints on the basis these were ‘service messages’ which did not require consent.

The ICO disagreed and decided this was a serious breach of regulation 22 of the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/2426) (PECR) because of American Express’ failure to take reasonable steps to avoid the breach, which could have included consulting the ICO's guidance on direct marketing.

Amongst others, the emails were sent to customers who had opted out of marketing messages. The ICO held that the emails were marketing messages.

The ICO said, "Service messages contain routine information such as changes to terms and conditions and payment plans or notice of service interruptions. Direct marketing is defined as any communication of advertising or marketing material directed at particular individuals. It is against the law to send marketing emails to people unless consent has been freely given. This is contained in Regulation 22 of the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003."

The fine is a reminder to exercise some judgment before sending emails to customers who may not have also provided consent to receive marketing messages. Do not assume that it is acceptable to disguise a marketing email as a ‘service message’ (for example an update about their account or the service which is really a promotion). These emails are still a breach of the rules if sent without the recipients’ valid consent. What matters is the content rather than the label the sender gives it.

 

Find out more

If you would like any help or support with trade marks, including dealing with oppositions to an application then visit our dedicated Intellectual Property pages or contact our expert team.

Contact our legal experts

Company & Industry

Related Insights

Insights

General Election 2024: What Are the Implications on Freelancers and Self-Employed Workers?

Posted on 15th July 2024 in Intellectual Property, Employment

The Labour Party has won the 2024 UK general election with a landslide majority following a 14-year Conservative Party rule, marking a new chapter. What’s next for the party and what are the potential implications on freelancers and self-employed workers?

Posted by

Jessica Whittick

Solicitor
Insights

Trademark Infringement and Director Liability: Recent Court Decision

Posted on 08th July 2024 in Intellectual Property

The UK’s highest Court has ruled that directors of companies that infringe trade marks can only be held personally liable as an accessory to that infringement if they know that what their company was doing amounted to trade mark infringement.

Posted by

Jessica Whittick

Solicitor